Protein content, gluten quality and flour strength: what the numbers mean for your dough

Why protein is only half the story

Walk into any bakery supplier and you will hear protein percentage quoted as the single measure of flour quality. "This one is 13% — it's strong." But two flours at 13% protein can behave completely differently in the oven. One gives a tall, open-crumbed sourdough that holds shape for 20 hours of fermentation. The other collapses after four hours and produces a gummy, low-volume loaf.

The difference is gluten quality — what kind of protein is in the flour, and how well it forms the elastic network that traps gas, supports structure, and survives mixing and fermentation. Protein quantity is the starting point. Gluten quality is what converts that quantity into performance.

This article maps the full picture: from the chemistry of gliadin and glutenin, through every spec-sheet parameter you can use to assess quality before committing to a flour, to a practical comparison of the flours available in the Domson catalogue.

Microscopic diagram of the gluten protein network in dough — interwoven gliadin and glutenin strands with trapped gas bubbles

---

1. What gluten actually is

The two proteins that make bread possible

Wheat flour contains many proteins, but two families are responsible for gluten formation: gliadins and glutenins. When flour is hydrated and mechanically worked, these proteins hydrate, unfold, and link together to form a three-dimensional viscoelastic network. [c41]

• Gliadin proteins are roughly spherical when dry. Hydrated, they become sticky and flow easily — they contribute extensibility: the ability of the dough to stretch without snapping. Think of gliadin as the plasticiser that lets you roll dough out flat.

• Glutenin proteins are large, chain-like molecules that can link to each other via disulphide bonds (S–S bonds formed between cysteine amino acid residues). They contribute elasticity: the ability to spring back after stretching. Glutenin is what makes dough snap back when you stretch it.

The key: it is the ratio and molecular weight of these two families that determines dough character. A flour with predominantly high-molecular-weight (HMW) glutenin subunits will produce a tight, elastic, gas-retaining dough — ideal for long-fermentation sourdough. A flour with high gliadin relative to glutenin will be extensible and flow easily — useful for biscuits and flatbreads, but not for tall loaves. [c51]

Why protein quantity is measured, not gluten directly

The analytical method most labs use — Kjeldahl or its near-infrared (NIR) equivalent — measures total nitrogen in the flour and multiplies by a conversion factor to estimate protein. For wheat flour, the factor is 5.7 (reflecting that wheat proteins contain approximately 17.5% nitrogen by weight). [c42]

This measures all nitrogen-containing compounds in the flour, including some non-gluten proteins. The resulting protein percentage is a proxy for gluten potential, not a direct measure of the gluten network itself.

| Flour type | Conversion factor used | Why | |---|---|---| | Wheat flour | N × 5.7 | Standard for wheat proteins | | Oat flour | N × 6.25 | Different amino acid composition | | Vital Wheat Gluten (regulatory) | N × 5.7 | EU/UK regulatory standard | | Vital Wheat Gluten (nutritional label) | N × 6.25 | Nutritional labelling convention |

[c42]

---

2. Protein content — what the numbers mean in practice

Typical protein ranges by application

The following ranges are cross-confirmed by BAKERpedia and the King Arthur Baking Professional Reference. Spec-sheet minimums may be lower — they are legal quality floors, not typical values. [c50]

| Application | Typical protein % | Why this level | |---|---|---| | Fine pastry, shortcrust, biscuits | 7–9 % | Weak, short gluten crumbles tenderly — structural strength is a defect here | | Sponge cake, muffin | 8–10 % | Light, delicate crumb requires minimal network development | | White sandwich bread, soft rolls | 10–12 % | Enough gluten to trap gas; not so much that the texture becomes chewy | | Rustic bread, baguette | 11–13 % | More structure for an open crumb; supports 4–8 h fermentation | | High-hydration sourdough, ciabatta | 12–14 % | Long fermentation (8–24 h) degrades gluten — must start from a strong baseline | | Enriched dough (brioche, croissant) | 12–14 % | Fat and sugar dilute and disrupt gluten — needs a strong starting network |

[c50]

What the Domson spec sheets confirm

Across ten reviewed products, here is what the first-party spec sheets actually commit to:

Polish wheat flours (Wągrowiec Mill specs, 2023):

• T450: protein minimum 8.0 %; wet gluten minimum 23.0 % [c01, c02]
• T750 (Domson Bread Flour): protein minimum 10.0 %; wet gluten minimum 26.0 % [c12, c13]

GoodMills Polska T550 Fortified (Edition 17, 2025):

• Protein range 11.5–12.5 %; wet gluten 28–32 %; gluten index 75–99 [c06, c05, c07]

Matthews Cotswold Flour, UK:

• Windrush Strong White: protein minimum 12.0 %, target 12.2 %, maximum 12.5 % [c16]
• Light Spelt: protein minimum 9.0 %, target 11.0 %, maximum 13.0 % (wide range reflecting spelt's natural variability) [c22]

Allied Mills, UK:

• Coniston Strong White: protein minimum 12.5 %, maximum 14.5 % — the highest minimum in the catalogue, reflecting its US hard wheat origin [c26]

Whitworth Bros, UK:

• Golden Jewel Pastry Flour: protein minimum 7.5 %, target 8.5 %, maximum 9.5 % [c30]

Doves Farm Foods:

• Wholemeal Spelt Flour: protein minimum 11.8 %, maximum 17.0 % (typical nutritional value 13.3 g/100g) [c32]
• Organic Strong White 'BioBake': typical protein 12.6 g/100g from nutritional analysis [c35]

Important note: every minimum on a spec sheet is a quality floor the miller guarantees the flour will not fall below. Actual deliveries typically land higher. If your process depends on a protein value above the spec minimum — for example, a very long sourdough — request a Certificate of Analysis (CoA) for each delivery, which gives you the actual measured value for that specific lot.

Two bread loaves side by side — small, dense low-protein loaf on the left; tall, well-risen high-protein loaf on the right

---

3. Wet gluten and gluten index — quality beyond quantity

Why wet gluten matters more than protein %

Two flours can have identical protein content but completely different baking performance because protein quality — specifically the proportion of HMW glutenin subunits — varies between wheat varieties and growing seasons.

Wet gluten content (measured by ISO 21415) directly isolates the gluten fraction. A dough is made from the flour, then mechanically washed under water until only the rubbery, insoluble gluten remains. The mass of the wet gluten is expressed as a percentage of flour weight.

The relationship between protein and wet gluten for typical European bread wheat:

Wet gluten % ≈ Protein % × 2.7 [c43]

This is a trade rule of thumb; the ratio varies widely — from approximately 2.2 to 3.0 or higher depending on variety, growing season, and protein quality (strong North American spring wheats can exceed 4.0 at very high protein). The 2.7 multiplier is a practical midpoint for European bread wheats; treat any estimate as an order-of-magnitude check only, never as a substitute for measurement in production QC.

GoodMills T550 Fortified confirms this in practice: protein 11.5–12.5% → wet gluten 28–32% (ratio ≈ 2.4–2.7 — within the expected range, confirmed in two spec editions). [c05, c06]

The gluten index: quality in a single number

The gluten index (ISO 7495) runs from 0 to 100 and is the most useful single quality measure after wet gluten content. Here is how it works:

After the wet gluten is collected, it is placed in a centrifuge fitted with a fine sieve. Gluten that is strong and elastic enough to resist being pushed through the sieve stays above — it is "retained." The gluten index is the percentage retained.

| Gluten index | What it means | Practical implication | |---|---|---| | < 60 | Weak, extensible gluten — degrades easily | Collapses under fermentation; gas escapes; flat loaf | | 60–75 | Medium — adequate for standard bread with improvers | Acceptable for most white bread; consider ascorbic acid supplement | | 75–90 | Strong — good for commercial bread and sourdough | The target range for most bread flour applications | | 90–99 | Very strong — may be over-tenacious | Excellent for gas retention; may fight the sheeter or moulder | | ~ 100 | Extremely tenacious | Dough tears when rolled; may need L-cysteine to relax |

GoodMills T550 Fortified specifies gluten index 75–99 — the only flour in the reviewed Domson catalogue set that prints this parameter. This confirms the flour is strong enough for commercial bread production while remaining within a workable range for shaping and sheeting. [c07]

The Matthews and Allied Mills specs do not report gluten index — this is normal for UK millers who express quality through protein target plus water absorption. The Wągrowiec Mill specs for T450 and T750 do not report gluten index either, relying on wet gluten content as the primary quality indicator.

What to request: if your application is a long-fermentation sourdough (8 h or more) or a high-hydration formula, and your current flour spec does not include a gluten index, request it from the supplier. A flour that shows 28% wet gluten but a gluten index of 55 will underperform a flour at 25% wet gluten with a gluten index of 85.

The windowpane test — a bakery check without a laboratory

A simple practical check that any baker can run is the windowpane test: take a small piece of fully developed dough, hold it between both hands, and slowly stretch it until it is thin enough to be translucent. If you can stretch it to near-transparency without it tearing, gluten development is complete. If it tears quickly, gluten is either under-developed (mix longer) or intrinsically weak (flour protein too low or gluten quality too poor for this application).

Two hands stretching dough to a thin translucent sheet — the windowpane test

---

4. Water absorption — the commercial value of gluten strength

Why water absorption matters

Water absorption is the percentage of water needed to bring a flour-water mixture to a standardised dough consistency (measured at 500 FU on the Brabender Farinograph, ISO 5530-1). [c47]

For a bakery, water absorption has direct commercial consequences: a flour at 60% water absorption can absorb 10% more water per kilogram than a flour at 50% absorption — that is 100 g more water per kg of flour, which becomes 100 g more dough at no additional ingredient cost.

Stronger, higher-protein flours generally have higher water absorption, because the expanded gluten network can hold more water without the dough becoming sticky.

What the spec sheets show

| Product | Water absorption (W/A%) | Spec source | |---|---|---| | Windrush Strong White Bread Flour | 55–61% (target 58%) | spec-windrush [c18] | | Matthews Light Spelt Flour | 53–65% (no target specified) | spec-spelt-matthews [c23] | | Coniston Strong White Flour | 58–61% | spec-coniston [c28] |

The GoodMills T550 Fortified and Wągrowiec Mill Polish flours do not report water absorption on their standard spec sheets. For Polish flours, ask the supplier for farinograph data — it is routinely measured in quality control even when not printed on the standard specification.

Practical rule: if you change flour and the spec shows a different water absorption, adjust recipe water proportionally before your first production run. A change from 58% to 62% W/A means your dough needs approximately 4% more water (on flour weight) to reach the same consistency. Failing to adjust is one of the most common causes of unexpected sticky dough in production.

The spelt water absorption paradox

Matthews Light Spelt Flour shows a water absorption range of 53–65 % — a 12-percentage-point spread, compared to Windrush Strong White's 6-point spread (55–61%). [c23]

This wide range is not a quality problem — it reflects the natural variability of spelt grain and its more fragile gluten structure. In practice it means: test your water rate at the start of every new batch of spelt flour. Do not assume that the rate that worked with the previous sack will work with the new one.

---

5. Flour strength: farinograph stability and alveograph W

Farinograph stability — mixing tolerance

The Brabender Farinograph records how a dough's resistance to mixing changes over time. The key output for production bakers is stability — the duration in minutes that the curve stays above (or near) the 500 FU reference line after the dough has peaked. A long stability means the flour tolerates over-mixing and extended fermentation without structural collapse. [c48]

| Stability | Flour classification | Practical implications | |---|---|---| | < 3 min | Weak (cake/biscuit flour) | Do not use for yeast bread | | 3–5 min | Medium | Standard white bread; keep fermentation under 4 h | | 6–10 min | Strong | Bread, sourdough, rolls; fermentation 4–12 h workable | | > 10 min | Very strong | Long fermentation, high-speed mechanical processing |

[c48]

Dough development time (DDT) is the time from water addition to the peak of the curve. [c49]

| DDT | Flour type | Action | |---|---|---| | < 2 min | Weak — develops instantly | Short mix; avoid over-mixing | | 2–4 min | Medium | Standard mix programmes | | 4–8 min | Strong bread flour | May need extended mixing or rest | | 6–12 min | Very strong / high-protein | Extended mixing required; autolyse helpful |

[c49]

Annotated farinograph trace comparing a strong bread flour and a weak pastry flour

None of the Domson catalogue flour spec sheets reviewed report farinograph DDT or stability directly. This is normal for standard commercial spec sheets in the Polish and UK markets. GoodMills Polska and Matthews Cotswold Flour both carry out farinograph testing as part of their in-house quality control — request the data for your specific delivery if mixing time optimisation is critical.

Alveograph W and P/L — strength and machinability

The Chopin Alveograph (ISO 27971) inflates a standardised dough disk into a bubble until it bursts, producing a pressure-volume curve. It generates three key values:

• W (deformation energy, ×10⁻⁴ J): the total area under the curve — the primary single-number measure of flour strength. [c58]
• P (overpressure at peak): tenacity — resistance to deformation.
• L (abscissa at rupture): extensibility — how far the bubble stretches before bursting.
• P/L ratio: balance indicator — the most practically useful for machinability and product quality.

W classification (European milling trade convention — French/Italian practice per IREKS Compendium and UK Flour Millers; note that American sources use lower tier boundaries, and Italian panettone flour labels often specify W 380–420 — the > 350 tier is a conservative floor): [c58]

| W value (×10⁻⁴ J) | Flour category | Typical applications | |---|---|---| | < 100 | Very weak | Biscuits only; no gas retention | | 100–170 | Weak | Soft cakes, wafer, sponge | | 180–250 | Medium | French baguette, rolls, pizza (2–6 h fermentation) | | 250–280 | Medium-strong | Sandwich bread, burger bun (4–8 h fermentation) | | 280–350 | Strong | Ciabatta, sourdough, focaccia (8–24 h fermentation) | | > 350 | Very strong | Panettone, brioche, babka, bagel (Italian commercial specs commonly target W 380–420) |

P/L balance for bread applications:

| P/L ratio | Gluten character | Problem / implication | |---|---|---| | < 0.3 | Extremely extensible | Dough spreads flat; poor gas retention; add ascorbic acid or VWG | | 0.3–0.5 | Extensible-balanced | Good for baguette, pizza, flatbread | | 0.5–0.7 | Balanced — ideal for most bread | Standard bread, sourdough, rolls | | 0.7–0.9 | Tenacious | Oven spring can be good; sheeting harder — allow more rest | | > 0.9 | Over-tenacious | Dough tears; poor shaping; consider L-cysteine or reducing rest |

Alveograph P/L curve comparison — over-tenacious flour versus balanced bread flour

Alveograph data is not printed on any Domson catalogue spec sheet reviewed. This is structurally normal for the Polish and UK markets. French and Italian millers include it as standard; Polish and UK millers typically provide it on request. If you run an automated sheeting or lamination line, or consistently produce long-fermentation sourdough, request alveograph W and P/L from your flour supplier — they will have this data internally.

---

6. Spelt: when high protein does not mean strong gluten

Spelt (Triticum spelta) is a distinct wheat species that produces flour with protein levels that can match or exceed common wheat — the Doves Farm Wholemeal Spelt Flour specifies protein 11.8–17.0 % [c32], and Matthews Light Spelt targets 11.0 % [c22]. Yet spelt dough consistently behaves as if it were much weaker.

The reason is structural: spelt has a lower proportion of HMW (high-molecular-weight) glutenin subunits compared to common wheat. HMW glutenins are the primary source of elasticity and gas-retention in the gluten network. Spelt gluten is dominated by more extensible, lower-molecular-weight proteins — it stretches easily but tears and collapses more readily than wheat gluten of the same percentage. [c55]

Practical consequences for spelt baking

| Property | Common wheat | Spelt | |---|---|---| | Over-mixing tolerance | High — stability > 7 min typical for strong bread flour | Low — collapses quickly after peak; autolyse is strongly recommended | | Fermentation tolerance | Good — gluten survives 8–16 h acidic fermentation | Limited — acidic hydrolysis of fragile gluten is faster; target < 8 h for standard spelt | | Water absorption | Consistent within a small range (e.g. Windrush: 55–61%) | Wide, variable range (Matthews Light Spelt: 53–65%) — test every batch | | Oven spring | Strong when dough correctly developed | Fragile — if over-fermented or over-mixed, collapses in oven |

Food-safety notice: Under EU Regulation 1169/2011 Annex II and UK Food Information Regulation 2014, spelt is listed as a variety of wheat under the "cereals containing gluten" category (Entry 1 names wheat "such as spelt and khorasan wheat"). In practice this means: the word SPELT (or SPELT WHEAT) must appear explicitly and with emphasis in the allergen declaration and ingredients list of any downstream product — a generic "contains gluten" or "contains wheat" is not sufficient to identify the specific cereal. Current FSA guidance and industry practice require the spelt grain to be named. Matthews Light Spelt spec confirms the allergen as "Made from spelt." [spec-spelt-matthews]

---

7. Vital Wheat Gluten — boosting protein when the flour is not strong enough

Vital Wheat Gluten (VWG) is produced by washing wheat starch out of a hydrated dough under water, then drying the remaining gluten fraction. The product in the Domson catalogue — BeneoPro VWG 75 (BENEO-Orafti) — specifies:

• Protein: minimum 75 g/100g d.m. (N×5.7); typical 79.5 g/100g (N×6.25) [c37]
• Water binding capacity: approximately 140–170 g water per 100 g VWG (AACC 56-30 method) [c38]
• Moisture: maximum 8 g/100g [c39]
• Ash: maximum 1 g/100g [c40]

The low moisture is critical — dry VWG stays inert until the dough is mixed. The high water binding (up to 1.7 times its weight in water) means that every addition of VWG requires a corresponding increase in recipe water.

When to use VWG

1. Protein correction: adding VWG to a lower-protein flour to reach a target protein for a specific application.
2. Seasonal variation compensation: maintaining consistent dough behaviour across seasons when grain protein varies.
3. High-fibre bread: added bran fibre particles physically cut gluten strands — VWG restores network integrity.
4. Rye and alternative grain blends: rye flour lacks wheat-equivalent gluten; VWG addition improves structure in mixed-grain loaves.

Dosage estimation

A rough calculation for protein correction using BeneoPro VWG 75:

VWG dose (% on flour weight) ≈ (Target protein % − Base flour protein %) × 1.35

Example: raising a T450 (min 8.0%) to 12.0%: (12.0 − 8.0) × 1.35 = 5.4 % VWG on flour weight Additional water needed: approximately 5.4 × 1.55 = 8.4 % additional water (using mid-range water binding of 155 g/100g). [c52, c53, c38]

Verify all dosage calculations with a trial bake before committing to production. VWG increases dough development time (longer mixing needed) and can make dough feel tighter initially.

Allergen notice: BeneoPro VWG 75 is a concentrated GLUTEN source. All products containing VWG must carry a gluten allergen declaration. There are no other declarable allergens in the BENEO VWG 75 product per its specification sheet. [spec-beneo-vwg]

---

8. Ascorbic acid — the hidden strength booster

Several flour spec sheets in the Domson catalogue mention ascorbic acid (Vitamin C, E300) as a declared flour treatment agent:

• GoodMills T550 Fortified: "some batches of flour can contain dough processing aid substances: Ascorbic acid (Vitamin C, E300), enzymes. In each case, it will be declared in the Quality documentation attached to the delivery." [spec-t550-goodmills-ed17]
• Doves Farm Organic Strong White BioBake: ascorbic acid listed in ingredients declaration. [spec-organic-strong-white-doves, c35]

How it works: ascorbic acid is an oxidising agent in dough. During mixing, it is rapidly converted to dehydroascorbic acid by oxygen, which then promotes the formation of disulphide bonds (S–S links) between glutenin proteins. This strengthens the gluten network, increasing W and reducing P/L — the dough becomes stronger and more elastic. [c56]

In practical terms: a flour receiving ascorbic acid will feel stronger and less sticky than the same base flour without it. If you change flour supplier and your new flour does not use ascorbic acid while the old one did, the dough may feel weaker and need a different mixing programme.

Typical ascorbic acid levels in flour are 20–200 ppm (parts per million), up to the legal maximum of 200 mg/kg (200 ppm) under UK Bread and Flour Regulations 1998 Schedule 3. At typical bread-application levels it has no detectable flavour impact on the finished bread.

Labelling note: ascorbic acid used as a flour treatment agent (E300) is a declarable food additive under UK Bread and Flour Regulations 1998 Schedule 3 and EU Regulation 1333/2008, not a non-declarable processing aid. It must be listed in the ingredients (by name or E-number) when present at functional levels in the finished flour. [c56]

---

9. Practical guide: choosing flour by strength requirements

Step 1: identify your fermentation time and dough type

The longer and more acidic the fermentation, the stronger the gluten needs to be at the start. Acids from sourdough fermentation (lactic and acetic acids) hydrolyse gluten proteins over time — gluten that starts at the minimum spec level will have degraded below the acceptable threshold by hour eight or twelve of fermentation.

| Fermentation type | Minimum protein target | Preferred indicators | |---|---|---| | Direct dough (< 2 h bulk) | 10–11 % | Wet gluten ≥ 26%, HFN ≥ 220 s | | Overnight cold retard (8–16 h) | 11.5–12.5 % | Wet gluten ≥ 28%, gluten index ≥ 75, HFN ≥ 250 s | | Long sourdough (16–24 h) | 12–13 % | Wet gluten ≥ 30%, gluten index ≥ 80, W ≥ 280 (request from supplier) | | Enriched dough (brioche, croissant) | 12–13 % | High W/A% (> 58%); P/L 0.5–0.7 to allow sheeting |

Step 2: read the spec sheet systematically

Follow this checklist every time you evaluate a new flour:

1. Protein % — is it above the minimum for your application?
2. Wet gluten % — is it specified? Does it confirm quality beyond protein quantity?
3. Gluten index — is it specified? If not, request it for sourdough or high-hydration applications.
4. Falling number — above 250 s is the target for most bread (above 220 s is the legal minimum floor).
5. Water absorption (W/A%) — note it and adjust recipe water accordingly.
6. Allergen declaration — mandatory review before any product launch.
7. Processing aids — check whether ascorbic acid or enzymes may be added; this affects dough behaviour and labelling.

Step 3: when the spec sheet is not enough

Request additional data from your supplier in these situations:

| When you need | What to request | |---|---| | Long fermentation sourdough (> 8 h) | Zeleny sedimentation index; alveograph W | | Automated sheeting or lamination | Alveograph P/L ratio | | High-output continuous mixer | Farinograph DDT and stability | | Rye or alternative grain blends | Amylograph peak viscosity for rye; protein analysis for the blend | | Seasonal protein variation complaints | Certificate of Analysis (CoA) per delivery lot |

---

10. Flour comparison: a quick-reference for the Domson range

See [table-catalogue-protein-specs] for the full comparison table extracted from spec sheets.

Key takeaways by product group:

For pastry, cakes, biscuits: Use Golden Jewel Pastry Flour (Whitworth Bros, protein 7.5–9.5%, target 8.5%). A lower-gluten flour is not a compromise — it is the correct tool for short, tender baked goods. [c30]

For everyday white bread and rolls: Use GoodMills T550 Fortified (protein 11.5–12.5%, wet gluten 28–32%, gluten index 75–99, HFN ≥ 220 s). This is the most completely specified flour in the catalogue — it gives you all four key quality numbers. [c05, c06, c07, c08]

For rustic, higher-extraction bread: Use Domson Bread Flour T750 (protein min 10.0%, wet gluten min 26.0%). The higher ash content (max 0.82%) provides mineral complexity and naturally occurring fermentation feed, which compensates partially for the lower protein minimum. Combine with a 48-hour cold retard only if you confirm incoming protein via CoA. [c12, c13]

For premium sourdough and long fermentation: Use Windrush Strong White (Matthews, protein 12.0–12.5%, HFN 250–400 s target 350, W/A 55–61%) or Coniston Strong White (Allied Mills, protein 12.5–14.5%, HFN min 250, W/A 58–61%). Both are consistently specified for the UK premium bread flour market. Windrush contains < 1.5% added VWG as a declared ingredient to meet its protein specification — VWG is an ingredient (not a statutory additive) and must appear in the ingredients list with an allergen declaration for wheat/gluten. [c16, c17, c18, c20, c26, c27, c28]

For spelt products: Matthews Light Spelt (protein target 11%, W/A 53–65%, HFN min 220) for white spelt bread; Doves Farm Wholemeal Spelt (protein min 11.8%, typical 13.3%) for wholegrain spelt loaves and crackers. Reduce mixing time, avoid long acidic fermentation, and test water rate per batch. Declare SPELT WHEAT (with appropriate emphasis) in the allergen statement and ingredients list on all downstream products — a generic "contains gluten" is not sufficient. [c22, c23, c24, c32]

For protein supplementation: BeneoPro VWG 75 (BENEO, protein min 75% d.m., water binding 140–170 g/100g) when you need to raise flour protein, compensate for seasonal variation, or restore gluten structure in high-fibre or rye-wheat blends. Declare GLUTEN allergen on all products. [c37, c38]

---

Coverage notes and gaps

Well-covered by spec sheets: Protein %, wet gluten %, gluten index (GoodMills only), falling number, and water absorption are all documented from first-party spec sheets across 10 products. GoodMills T550 parameters are cross-confirmed in two spec editions (2016 and 2025). Matthews Windrush protein and HFN specifications are corroborated by the Allied Mills Coniston spec (both 12+ % protein, HFN min 250 s for UK premium bread flour).

Medium confidence: The wet gluten ÷ protein ratio (×2.7 estimate) is a widely cited trade rule of thumb; the ratio varies 2.5–3.0 by variety and season. No peer-reviewed primary source was accessed in this session. Alveograph W tier boundaries are European milling trade convention — American sources use different boundaries.

Gaps (not covered by spec sheets reviewed): No alveograph W or P/L data was found on any reviewed Domson spec sheet. No Zeleny sedimentation values appear on any Polish flour spec sheet in the catalogue. No farinograph DDT or stability values are printed on any spec sheet. Bakers requiring these parameters for process optimisation should request them directly from GoodMills Polska, Matthews Cotswold Flour, or Allied Mills.

Follow-up recommended: A1-rye-flour-guide (covering amylograph and rye falling number in detail) and A3-bread-improvers-overview (covering ascorbic acid, L-cysteine, and VWG as functional additives in context) are the recommended companion articles.